Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for EV Batteries: A Review

Article information

J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2025;16(3):267-286
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 January 10
doi : https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2024.01060
Centre for Development of Advanced Computing, Bangalore, India
*CORRESPONDENCE T: +91-7204742806 E: sneha92.cdac@gmail.com
Received 2024 October 11; Accepted 2025 January 10.

Abstract

For the safe and efficient operation of electric vehicles, health monitoring and the prognosis of their battery systems are essential. The level of complexity in diagnostic and prognostic tools is increasing in tandem with the continuous evolution of technologies in Electric Vehicles (EV). Effective battery diagnostics help improve the longevity and performance of EV batteries and achieve environmental and economic benefits. Direct measurement of battery voltage, current, impedance, and temperature, electrochemical techniques like cyclic voltammetry and impedance spectroscopy, data-driven and model-based approaches are the different tools available for diagnosis and prognosis of EV batteries. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) is a robust, non-invasive, and non-destructive electrochemical technique used to characterize and model electrochemical systems, by measuring their impedance spectrum. EIS is a widely used technique with applications in the study of corrosion, paint, sensors, biosensors, batteries, fuel cells, etc. It is a powerful diagnostic and prognostic tool for battery systems to carry out functions like failure prediction, thermal management, fault detection etc. This review focuses on the implementation of EIS technique in various EV battery applications, highlighting both the unique advantages and challenges faced in its implementation.

INTRODUCTION

Over the years, electric vehicle (EV) technology has evolved with a concerted effort to address consumer concerns and expand its market reach. A primary challenge has been mitigating “range anxiety,” or the fear of running out of battery life before reaching a charging station. This concern has spurred significant advancements in battery technology, focusing on enhancing energy density to extend vehicle range and reduce charging times. Moreover, engineers have been improving overall performance by developing more powerful electric motors and efficient drivetrains, thereby making EVs environmentally friendly. Reducing production costs has also been a critical area of focus, aiming to make EVs a more financially viable option for a broader audience. Sustainability is maintained as a core principle, with continuous efforts to incorporate eco-friendly materials and processes throughout the EV lifecycle. Recognizing the importance of convenience, there is a strong initiative to expand the charging infrastructure, which includes developing faster charging solutions. Battery remains the core of the EVs, and its performance impacts all these factors: range anxiety, production cost, sustainability, performance and infrastructure costs.

The EV battery requires robust diagnosis and prognosis methods throughout its life cycle. The crucial parameters for battery diagnostics and lifespan estimation are its State of Charge (SoC), State of Health (SoH) and State of Function (SoF) values. For prognostic studies, a battery’s Remaining Useful Life (RUL) is estimated from its SoC, SoH, historical data and external factors such as temperature, charging cycles etc. Diagnostic tools available for battery systems can be categorized into direct and indirect. The direct methods are Open Circuit Voltage (OCV), impedance, current, and temperature measurements while the indirect approaches are based on machine learning (ML), physics and empirical modeling. The OCV method is the easiest to implement since there is a linear relationship between a battery’s OCV and its SoC. However, batteries need to be given a certain amount of rest period before each OCV measurement and is a low-accuracy approach. Also, it is not suitable for onboard applications. Coulomb counting is also a low-accuracy, easy-to-implement methodology but not ideal for onboard diagnosis.

The most commonly used tools for battery health estimation are Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization (HPPC), Direct Current Internal Resistance (DCIR), Incremental Capacity Analysis (ICA) and Partial Charging Method (PCM), to name a few. HPPC methodology measures voltage response of a battery to a series of charge and discharge pulses, at different values of battery SoC. While this method provides detailed insights into the dynamic power capabilities of batteries, offering high accuracy, long diagnostic time and complexity of data analysis are its two significant limitations [1,2]. DCIR method measures internal resistance, both AC and DC values, of a battery with the help of a step current signal. It is simple and quick to implement with minimal equipment, while reflecting the real state of battery cycle aging more effectively; however, it fails to provide detailed insights into battery health [3]. ICA technique uses differentiation of capacity against voltage on a constant current charge, thus enabling tracking of the characteristic peaks and valleys, offering accuracy at nominal computational costs. However, incremental capacity data requires further processing, and initial SOC values of a cell may compromise its health diagnosis. PCM data is obtained from a given charge measured in a specific voltage range. The biggest advantage of this tool is its simplicity, and elimination of the need for data processing, with the disadvantage being its limited applicability to normal battery operation given that the charging current is constant [4].

Real-time onboard applications benefit greatly from the high accuracy of model-based and machine learning technologies. However, in model-based strategies, accuracy of the model decides the accuracy of the diagnosis while in ML strategy; accuracy is decided by the quantity and quality of the training data. Both indirect approaches are complex, with the ML method being highly computational. Battery prognostic tools are mainly of two types, namely battery performance modeling methods and data-driven tools. Battery dynamics being time-varying and non-linear, a lot of inaccuracy creeps into the estimation of RUL from a battery’s electrochemical model, failing to detect intermittent failures. Hence, a data-driven approach is preferred since it has high accuracy and is model-free, eliminating the need for system-specific information. A hybrid method combining both model-based and data-driven approaches can also be utilized towards dynamic prognosis [5,6].

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a tool for measurement of impedance, employed towards in-situ and real-time analysis of the various dynamic processes happening within a battery and to obtain its SoC, SoH, cell temperature, and cell potential in real-time [710]. It goes beyond simple voltage or current measurements. By analyzing the battery’s impedance response at various frequencies, it reveals information about internal processes occurring inside a battery like ion mobility, charge transfer reactions at the electrodeelectrolyte interface, conductivity of the electrolyte, battery component degradation, corrosion of battery components etc. While other methods might provide a general indication of decline in battery health, insights from EIS studies help pinpoint specific degradation mechanisms and provide a detailed understanding of the overall health of the battery. This allows for targeted solutions to address these issues and improve battery longevity. EIS being a non-destructive technique does not require extracting samples or stressing the battery. It analyzes the battery’s response to a small AC electrical signal, providing valuable information without harming the battery itself. This is crucial for monitoring health of a battery system over its lifespan without compromising its performance.

This technique allows a detailed study of the impedance behavior of any battery system, which in turn helps in determining its parameters, offering the possibility to detect cell degradation at an early stage and is hence an ideal partner for a Battery Management System (BMS). Unlike model-based diagnosis, EIS doesn’t rely on pre-built models specific to battery types, hence easier to implement for various battery types and chemistries, making this technology an excellent choice for new or emerging battery technologies. ML models require large datasets specific to a battery type and operating conditions they were trained in. They might not perform well with entirely new battery chemistries, whereas EIS studies can be conveniently carried out for various battery chemistries, with a few adjustments in data interpretation. EIS-based SoC and SoH estimation is more accurate than the traditional voltage, current, and resistance measurement methods [8,11]. Also, this methodology provides the most detailed insight into battery SoH; each circuit element derived from the impedance spectrum indicates specific aging processes [11]. Thus, EIS is a promising diagnosis and prognosis tool for EV batteries.

With this review, it is intended to provide a comprehensive report on applicability of EIS tool to EV batteries, along with factors to consider when applying the technique. Since the availability of literature for EIS technique utilization in EV batteries is scant, utilization of the tool for general batteries has also been considered. Section 2 outlines the various types of EVs and battery technologies used in EVs, in order to provide a better understanding of the applicability of EIS methodology to EV batteries. Also, preliminary concepts are presented for the reader’s understanding, before setting out to explain impedance studies of battery systems in the next section. Section 3 outlines the basic concepts of impedance spectroscopy, along with a detailed explanation on the representation of impedance data of battery systems, estimation of battery parameters from the data, and an in-depth analysis of Nyquist plots obtained for LiBs. Also, utilization of the tool for various types of battery studies, followed by its utilization for EV batteries is addressed. In section 4, challenges faced in the implementation of EIS in EV battery studies are discussed, followed by section 5 presenting the conclusion and future outlook for the technology in the automotive industry.

ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND BATTERY TECHNOLOGY

Over the years, electric vehicles have evolved with an aim to become sustainable mainstream transportation solutions. In this section, we see the classification of EVs, battery technologies applicable for EV batteries, the measurement parameters for the battery and their applications in battery management systems (BMS).

EV classifications

EVs can be classified as Battery-powered Electric Vehicles (BEV), Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV), and Fuel Cell Electric vehicles (FCEV). They are collectively termed as New Energy Vehicles (NEV) as these are zero or low-emission vehicles that are either partially or fully powered by electricity. Rising oil costs and increasing environmental pollution are the two major reasons that countries around the world are quickly adopting NEVs. NEVs use energy conversion and storage devices like batteries and fuel cells to generate and store electricity, which in turn power electric motors. A summary table providing details about the different types of NEVs is shown in Table 1 below.

Summary table for NEVs

In 2023, global sales of BEVs and PHEVs increased by 31 %. 9.5 million of the 13.6 million EVs that were sold worldwide in 2023 were BEVs; the other vehicles were PHEVs. PHEVs are more efficient than HEVs but less efficient than BEVs; HEVs are the least efficient among the various EV types. BEVs are best suited as short range and small vehicles, and FCEVs as medium-large and long range vehicles [12]. Challenges involved in production, transportation and hydrogen storage, along with the high infrastructure cost of hydrogen supply stations are the cause of declining interest in the use of FCEVs for common passenger vehicle applications [13]. One major advantage of battery operated EVs over FCEVs is that they have higher energy efficiency and hence, lower fuel cost [14]. Also, in 2023, FCEV sales decreased by about 30 %, worldwide. EIS technique is useful in early detection of degradation and enhancement of efficiency, management and safety features of batteries and fuel cells in battery-operated EVs and FCEVs, respectively.

Battery technology in EVs

Batteries are the heart of EVs. A battery is an electrochemical system used to convert chemical energy into electrical energy, consisting of three major components, anode, cathode and an electrolyte that separates the two. Oxidation is the process of electron loss that transpires at the anode, and reduction is the process of electron gain that occurs at the cathode. An external circuitry provides the path for electrons from the oxidized species to travel to the reduced species, so that the resulting current can do useful work. To maintain electroneutrality, the two electrodes also exchange ions. Electrolyte, being a good ionic conductor and an electrical insulator, acts as a medium only for the exchange of ions. An illustrative schematic for a battery system is shown in Fig. 1. Ions transverse from cathode to anode during the charging cycle of battery, and in the opposite direction during the discharging cycle, with electrons forced through the load as shown in Fig. 1 [15]. In Fig. 1, M+ denotes ions and e- denotes electrons. The kinetics of electrochemical reactions occurring inside a battery depend on ion transport through the negative and positive active materials, electron injection/ extraction at current collector/active material interfaces, and ion insertion/extraction at electrolyte/active material interfaces [16].

Fig. 1.

Schematic of a battery.

Since the time research towards vehicle electrification intensified, many different battery technologies like nickel–zinc (NiZn), lead–acid, and Lithium-ion batteries (LiB) have been explored. Lead-acid battery technology’s adoption in the EV industry has been limited due to its shortcomings like low specific energy, short lifecycle, poor cold-temperature performance, gas development during charging, sulfation and stratification effects, yet it has advantages of being inexpensive, safe, reliable, and recyclable [17].

In HEVs, the primary focus lies in utilizing the battery for a regenerative braking system for improved fuel economy. So, the emphasis is on power over energy to be able to withstand high current pulses during both charge and discharge; Ni-based battery chemistries more than meet the high specific power requirements. NiZn battery technology, in spite of having advantages like higher energy and lower costs compared to its other Ni-based counterparts, its commercialization did not go well due to issues with short circuits, cycle life, and gas recombination in a sealed cell. NiMH batteries are widely used in HEVs due to their high power, wide operating temperature range capabilities, cost-effective life-of-vehicle performance, and abuse tolerance. The main drawbacks of this technology are their high cost, the need to control hydrogen loss, the high self-discharge rate, and heat generation at high temperatures above 30°C [18]. In EV/PHEV applications, energy is emphasized over power to maximize vehicle range and minimize the weight penalty introduced by batteries. LiB technology has the upper hand over Ni-based batteries in terms of weight and size and also performance characteristics like higher efficiencies, lower self-discharge rate, longer cycle life, higher energy and power densities [19].

Battery Performance Indicators

In this section, we proceed by discussing the commonly used battery performance indicators available in the literature that are used in diagnosis and prognosis methods. The voltage and temperature values, cell balancing, coolant flow, etc. of the battery device is monitored to maintain the device within its Safe Operating Area (SOA) i.e., charge and discharge rates, voltage, current, and temperature windows defined by the cell manufacturer. If a battery leaves its SOA, its performance quickly degrades, leading to explosions or fires. The most critical indicators for any battery system are its SoC, SoH, SoF, and RUL.

SoC

A battery’s SoC value indicates how much energy it can deliver until it reaches its End of Discharge (EoD) time. This parameter depends on its discharge profile, and it changes non-linearly as the battery discharges. It affects battery cell aging and is necessary for increasing efficiency. A cell’s estimated SoC, which ranges from 0% to 100%, gives its current capacity as a function of its rated capacity. When a cell’s SoC is 100%, it is said to be completely charged; when it is 0%, it is said to be fully discharged. Also, as a cell ages, its maximum SoC value decreases. The fact that SoC estimation is highly reliant on the actual capacity of the battery cell, which is affected by temperature, age, and current rate, is a significant challenge. Apart from its inherent significance, the SOC serves as the cornerstone for other states [20].

SoH

A battery’s SoH value is the proportion of its maximum charge to its rated capacity. SoH is one of the factors that determine the correctness of the estimated SoC value. The value of SoH varies depending on the operating conditions faced by the battery over its lifespan and and their consequent influence on the battery’s aging mechanisms [21]. The value of this parameter is 100% for a new battery while it reaches about 80 % for a battery reaching its end of life, the value [20]. SoC estimation is useful in characterizing the short-term operation of batteries while estimation of SoH is associated with the long-term cycle life of batteries [22].

SoF

SoF gives continuous and instantaneous load capability of a battery. It shows whether the battery has sufficient power capability to carry out a specific function. It combines SoC and SoH information to give the remaining run time of the battery. By comparing estimated SoC value with the available capacity, this parameter observes battery readiness in terms of usable energy [23].

RUL

RUL is the amount of time giving the number of remaining charge/discharge cycles left in a battery before its end of life (EOL). Precise RUL prediction can help guarantee the safe operation of a battery, with its timely replacement and repair [24].

IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY TECHNIQUE TOWARDS EV BATTERY APPLICATIONS

The overall market for LiB testing equipment is expected to grow significantly in the coming years, driven by the increasing demand for EVs. This indirectly suggests a rise in the use of battery diagnostic and prognostic tools like EIS. Major automotive companies and battery manufacturers are actively involved in research on advanced battery diagnostics and prognostics, indicating a strong industry push in this direction.

Battery impedance and its relation with performance metrics

Internal impedance arises in a battery due to the inherent characteristics of the different materials used, the interaction between the materials, and the various chemical reactions. It provides insight into the state of operation and overall health of the battery. Internal resistance is a key indicator of a battery’s ability to carry current and hence, its capability to deliver power and should ideally be zero. Higher internal resistance causes higher energy loss in a battery, leading to increased heat dissipation and degradation of the battery. SoH and SoC parameters of a battery are related to its internal impedance; impedance increases as SoC decreases, the relation being more apparent at lower frequencies. Temperature also directly impacts battery impedance; impedance decreases as temperature increases, ignoring the extremes [25]. Moreover, changes in relaxation time also affect its impedance.

As a cell ages, its impedance increases and capacity reduces, due to degradation of its electrical contacts, electrode materials, and electrolyte. Hence, keeping track of variations in internal impedance with time will help in monitoring the deterioration of cells. The reduction in capacity mainly affects the amount of energy that the cell can deliver in each cycle. As a standard practice, a battery is considered degraded when it can deliver only 75% of its nominal capacity, and understanding how its internal impedance varies with time before reaching the degradation point helps in accurately determining the amount of energy that can be stored and delivered [22,26]. Cycle life for a rechargeable battery is the number of charge and discharge cycles that it can complete before its performance degrades significantly [23,2729]. Calendar aging refers to the gradual degradation of batteries over time and without cycling.

Battery impedance representation

Impedance values are depicted in the form of Nyquist and Bode plots, which help in the analysis of coupled electrochemical reactions occurring at different rates in the system under study. In a Nyquist plot, real impedance, Zr is plotted on the x-axis while –Zi, negative imaginary impedance is plotted on the y-axis since most electrochemical systems show a more capacitive behavior. In a Bode plot, either the magnitude or the phase of complex impedance is plotted against frequency. Logarithmic scale is used for representation of frequency and impedance magnitude while linear scale is used for phase angle representation. Bode plot representation has two major advantages over Nyquist plot representation, which are frequency explicit data representation and ease in resolving small impedances in the presence of large impedances; in Nyquist plots, small impedances are swamped by large impedances. Nyquist plots are more complex to understand but are used more in electrochemistry due to two major reasons, their high sensitivity to changes and being able to directly read some parameters from the plots.

By analyzing impedance plots, equivalent electrical circuits can be derived for electrochemical systems. Apart from the conventional electric circuit elements, resistance, capacitance, and inductance, two other circuit elements are also defined for modeling of electrochemical systems i.e., Warburg impedance and Constant Phase Element (CPE). CPEs are used to represent non-ideal or imperfect capacitance effects inherently present in the system under study and they exhibit 80–90° phase shift. Warburg impedance represents diffusion control i.e., resistance offered to mass transfer and it exhibits a 45° phase shift. The important parameters that can be estimated from EIS data are electrolyte resistance, RS, double layer capacitance, Cdl or CPEdl, and charge transfer resistance, Rct. RS gives resistance of any ionic solution and depends on ionic concentration, type of ions, temperature as well as the geometry of the area in which the current is carried. Consider a bounded area with area, A, and length, l, carrying a uniform current, then RS is defined as equal to ƿl/A. On the interface between an electrode and its surrounding electrolyte, an electrical double layer forms due to the adsorption of ions onto the surface of the electrode. An insulating space, in the order of Angstrom, separates the charged electrode from the charged ions, forming a parallel plate capacitor, represented by Cdl or CPEdl. Rct is resistance formed by a single kinetically controlled electrochemical reaction [30,31].

Every electrochemical interface, be it a solid/liquid interface or a solid/solid interface can be modeled as a Randles circuit, one of the simplest and most used equivalent circuit models. It consists of RS in series with a parallel combination of Cdl or CPEdl and Faradaic impedance. The simplest case of Randles circuit consists of charge transfer resistance, Rct, solely as Faradaic impedance. Randles circuit appears as a depressed semicircle in the Nyquist plot, each semicircle is characterized by an RC time constant, . ‘’ gives the time taken by a capacitor to charge to about 63.2 % of its maximum value, or the time it takes to discharge to about 36.8 % of its maximum value.

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

EIS technique is a superior electroanalytical tool used to study the harmonic response of an electrochemical system and characterize its behavior. It can identify and distinguish between the various electrochemical processes taking place inside a system, which establishes its uniqueness over other analytical techniques. A small sinusoidal perturbation potential (or current), over a broad range of frequencies from microhertz to megahertz, is applied to the system to be studied and the resulting current (or potential) is recorded. The kinetic and mass transport properties, along with capacitive properties of the device under study can be deduced from real and imaginary components of its impedance calculated over the entire frequency range. The real component of impedance corresponds to a resistance in-phase with the applied voltage and the imaginary component, with a reactance out-of-phase with the applied voltage.

EIS methodology can be potentiostatic or galvanostatic depending on whether the applied signal is potential or current. The potentiostatic mode of operation is not well suited for battery studies since batteries have low impedance. Even a slight inaccuracy in the applied AC voltage could result in an unexpectedly large current that could change the battery’s SoC. However, in galvanostatic mode, the battery voltage and SoC are typically unaffected since the galvanostat can easily adjust the applied current to an accuracy of a few milliamperes [32]. EIS methodology can be linear wherein a small perturbation potential is employed or nonlinear, employing a perturbation potential of large amplitude and recording the resulting current response at higher harmonics along with the fundamental frequency. The advantage of EIS methodology over other electrochemical techniques is its unique ability to isolate and distinguish the various electrochemical processes happening at the same time in a system. If the processes have sufficiently different time constants, then EIS can easily differentiate between them.

Applicability of EIS to battery studies

Throughout a battery’s lifetime, EIS can be used for prognosis and diagnosis by studying the impact of manufacturing factors, temperature, cell charge/discharge, state parameters, and other storage/operating conditions on its degradation mechanisms [33]. A typical Nyquist plot obtained for a lithium-ion cell along with an equivalent electrical circuit derived from the plot is shown in Fig. 2. A detailed analysis of the Nyquist plot allows us to evaluate various phenomena in different parts of the battery. Lithium-ion migration in the electrolyte is evident as impedance in the high-frequency region, near about 1 kHz. Lithium-ion diffusion occurs within the electrode in the low frequency region, at frequencies less than 1 Hz and Li-ion transfer reactions occur in the intermediate frequency region of 1 to several hundreds of Hz. Impedance measurements recorded at lower frequencies in a battery, give information about electrochemical reactions happening at its electrode/electrolyte interfaces. For batteries involving intercalation of species, impedance data at low frequencies (less than 1 Hz) give diffusion coefficient for the process. The ohmic resistance of electrolyte can be derived from impedance data recorded at high frequencies (above 1 kHz), while Solid Electrolyte Interphase layer (SEI) capacitance and electron transfer rate can be derived from impedance data recorded at intermediate frequencies (1 Hz–1 kHz). Meaningful interpretation of EIS data requires mapping of the various spectroscopic features to battery impedance components. Each section of the impedance spectrum is associated with a specific electrochemical phenomenon; the circuit element or combination of circuit elements corresponding to each section is shown directly below it in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Typical Nyquist plot of a Lithium-ion cell along with the derived equivalent electrical circuit [35].

Ohmic resistance, Rs of the equivalent circuit represents the intersection of the Nyquist plot with the real axis at a non-zero value. This value equals the sum of current collectors, active material, electrolyte, and separator resistances. In the high-frequency region of the plot, inductor L represents the inductive effect in the battery caused by the geometry and porosity of its electrode plates. The first semicircle in the intermediate frequency region is generated by lithium-ion diffusion through the Solid-Electrolyte Interface (SEI) layer, given by CPE1|RSEI. The second semi-circle in the intermediate frequency region corresponds to double layer capacity and charge transfer resistance at the electrodes, given by CPE2|RCT [34]. The diagonal line with a constant, positive slope shown at low frequencies corresponds to Warburg impedance, W in the equivalent circuit. This impedance is due to the diffusion of lithium ions in the electrodes and it depends on the frequency of the applied perturbation potential. At high frequencies, the Warburg impedance obtained is small because diffusing reactants do not cover large distances. At low presence of double-layer capacitance, CPE can be accounted for by non-ideal frequencies, the reactants diffuse farther, resulting in higher values of Warburg impedance [35]. The properties of battery materials like inhomogeneity, surface roughness, porosity, etc. but the exact reasons are unclear.

With variations in operating point and aging of a battery, the form of the Nyquist plot derived for the battery also varies. In applications that involve battery charging and discharging at temperatures as low as –30°C, the battery degrades with the slowing down of chemical processes, resulting in the widening of both semi-circles, corresponding to higher cell impedance. At high temperatures of about 50°C, both semi-circles tend to merge and cannot be distinguished anymore. This is because the time constants of the internal processes associated with the semi-circles are getting closer in value [36]. Also, the real axis crossing point increases with decrease in temperature. In the semi-circle corresponding to lower frequencies, the radius increases strongly with a reduction of SoC, especially for SoC values under 30%. In an aging battery, the impedance spectrum shifts towards the right, as a manifestation of the increase in series resistance. Some more research groups have also reported increments observed in a radius of semi-circles of the Nyquist plot [3739].

Battery state estimation with impedance spectroscopy

Voltage measurement, internal resistance measurement and Ampere-hour counting are the most popular methods utilized for the assessment of a battery’s charge state. The Ampere-hour counting method is used when the initial value of SoC is known, whereas for the internal resistance measurement approach, the value of the initial SoC is not needed, however, due to minimal changes in internal resistance during discharging, high accuracy in not achievable. Monitoring of voltage of a battery is a quick way of determining its SoC, but this method is highly unreliable and inaccurate since open circuit voltage must be measured after relaxation time, and suitable temperature correction needs to be applied. EIS method of determining battery SoC is more accurate than the above-mentioned three methods and can be carried out, both ex situ i.e., current-off state as well as in situ i.e., during charging or discharging state [9].

Different approaches are followed to determine a battery’s SoC value from its impedance spectrum, by utilizing either the correlation between internal resistance and SoC, which is not well established for all systems, the relation between high-frequency resistance RHF and frequency at which RHF is measured with SoC or the relation between parameters of derived equivalent electrical circuit with SoC [40]. A battery’s internal resistance does not strictly correspond to its SoH. Further tests are needed to estimate SoH. The variation of EIS spectra with SoC and SoH is critical for effective battery management, with some example data shown in fig. 3. SoF of a battery is often defined on a digital scale, whether it can support a particular application in its current state or not. This battery parameter is affected by other parameters such as SoH, SoC, temperature and terminal voltage of the battery [41]. Prediction of RUL is very challenging since it depends on many factors such as the battery’s current health state, historical data, and failure mechanisms [42]. Table 2 lists out all the research works carried out in utilization of EIS for battery state estimation.

Fig. 3.

(a) EIS curves at different values of SoC [43] and (b) EIS curves at different values of SoH for LiB [44].

Application of EIS towards battery state estimation

Battery temperature studies with impedance spectroscopy

Temperature significantly affects performance of batteries, limiting their applications. To ensure safety, durability and efficient management of a battery, understanding the effect of temperature on battery performance is crucial. –20°C to 60°C is the acceptable operating region for LiBs. At both high and low temperatures outside of this region, their performance degrades and they lose a significant amount of their power and energy, along with irreversible damages, such as lithium plating and thermal runaway [64]. In LiBs working at low temperatures, Li plating causes permanent reduction in its performance while declined reactivity and diminished ionic conductivity cause temporary reduction in its performance, drastically affecting its usable capacity and impedance [65]. However, to track cell temperature, it is not feasible to equip every cell with a temperature sensor in large battery systems such as those in electric vehicles. Also, conventional temperature sensors such as thermocouple or thermistor is mounted on the cell surface and do not detect the core temperature, hence detecting an offset due to the temperature gradient.

EIS is a sensor less temperature estimation method for batteries that utilizes the strong dependency of battery temperature on its characteristic impedance response. At low temperatures, the impedance increases due to higher resistances and lower reaction rates, resulting in lower capacity and power output. At high temperatures, the impedance decreases due to lower resistances and faster reaction rates. Hence, this technique can help identify degradation mechanisms inside a battery that are accelerated by high or low temperatures. This technique has upper hand over other sensorless methods which either require great computational effort for solving partial differential equations or require error-prone parameterization.

Table 3 lists out all the research carried out in implementation of EIS for temperature studies in batteries.

Application of EIS towards temperature studies in batteries

Battery characterization studies with impedance spectroscopy

EIS can be used for characterizing electrode materials, electrode kinetics electrode/electrolyte interfaces to obtain insights into their electrochemical behavior, performance, health and detection of internal faults and anomalies. Table 4 lists all the research carried out towards the application of EIS in battery characterization.

Application of EIS towards battery characterization

Battery degradation, ageing and cycling performance studies with impedance spectroscopy

Ageing diagnosis is essential to maintain reliability and optimum performance of a battery system, over time. In the conventional BMS, battery ageing is monitored with the help of two metrics: capacity and power fade. However, these metrics are not sufficient to identify the root causes of battery ageing. EIS technique can be applied in study of degradation and ageing processes related to cycling as well as calendar ageing, in batteries. EIS technique helps in identifying and quantifying aging mechanisms over time, thus by integrating this methodology with BMS, battery lifetime control strategies can be implemented within the BMS. Cycling performance of a battery is defined by the number of times it can be charged and discharged before it reaches its end of life. Impedance data obtained for a battery can also be correlated with its cycling performance. Fig. 4 shows Nyquist plot data obtained for fresh and aged LiBs. Table 5 summarizes all the research carried out towards the same. Integration of EIS into BMS enhances battery monitoring, management, and optimization capabilities, enabling improved performance, reliability, and lifespan of battery.

Fig. 4.

EIS spectrum at different SoC for a (a) fresh cell and an (b) aged cell [82].

Implementation of EIS towards study of battery degradation and ageing

Integration of impedance spectroscopy with battery management system

Nowadays, batteries have an operational lifetime of more than 10 years [8]. A battery needs a Battery Management System (BMS), an embedded system comprising hardware and software subsystems, for its safe, reliable, and efficient functioning. BMS monitors the voltage, temperature, cell balancing, coolant flow, etc. of the battery device it is connected to, to maintain the device within its Safe Operating Area (SOA) i.e., charge and discharge rates, voltage, current, and temperature windows defined by the cell manufacturer. If a battery leaves its SOA, its performance quickly degrades, leading to explosions or fires. The major functionalities handled by BMS are monitoring, control, and parameter estimation. The three most critical indicators estimated by the BMS to monitor battery performance are State of Charge (SoC), State of Health (SoH), and State of Function (SoF). These states cannot be measured and hence, are estimated from measured parameters, voltage, current, and temperature of the battery. The accuracy of the estimated battery states decides the quality of battery management achieved by BMS [21]. SoC value gives the amount of energy that a battery can deliver until it reaches its End of Discharge (EoD) time. SoH value is the ratio of maximum charge in a battery to its rated capacity. SoC of a battery depends on its discharge profile and it changes non-linearly as the battery discharges. SoH is one of the factors that determine the accuracy of the estimated SoC value. SoF gives continuous and instantaneous load capability of a battery. It combines SoC and SoH information to give the remaining run time of the battery.

Often, only surface temperature and cell voltage data are available to online algorithms running on BMS, to keep track of battery performance and health, neglecting the impact of changing environmental factors [89]. Nonlinear state estimators like extended Kalman filtering and sigma-point Kalman filtering have been implemented for battery systems, resulting in improved accuracy but increased computation [90]. Complex physics-based modeling approaches have also been explored, but they are not implementable in real-time applications due to their impractical demand for computational resources. Since onboard battery systems in EVs face harsh working conditions, they are highly susceptible to thermal runaway occurrences due to mechanical, electrical, or heat triggers. Thermal safety is currently the major bottleneck for mass adoption of EVs [91]. A battery pack in an EV consists of hundreds of thousands of cells connected in parallel and/or series. They need to be resistant to crash events since damaging effects can turn out severe due to large amounts of stored energy [92]. Also, in an EV, BMS must interface with several other onboard systems and work in real-time with rapid charging/discharging cycles of the battery as the vehicle is accelerating/ braking. With the rising market demand for fast–charging batteries, the batteries need to be protected from the formation of dendrites at anode material and temperature peaks. Hence, battery management is much more demanding in EVs than in portable batteries. The BMS, with its complex network of sensors and heat conditioning system, must ensure delivery of the required range of voltage and current for a duration of time, against expected load scenarios in the vehicle and work towards enhancing the vehicle’s battery life and driving cycle, all the while ensuring its safe operation [93].

Integration of EIS into BMS enhances battery monitoring, management, and optimization capabilities, enabling improved performance, reliability, and lifespan of battery systems across various applications. Table 6 summarizes the research carried out so far, in integrating EIS technique with BMS systems.

Application of EIS towards BMS

Non-linear impedance spectroscopic battery studies

Nonlinear EIS (NLEIS), a moderate amplitude extension to linear EIS, when implemented as an add-on to traditional linear EIS, provides complementary information to EIS which helps gain new insights into charge transfer kinetics, thermodynamics, and mass transport processes happening inside a battery [24]. Table 7 summarizes research carried out in implementation of nonlinear EIS technique in study of batteries.

Nonlinear EIS implementation in battery studies

Utilization of EIS technique in study of EV batteries

For automotive applications, it is not sufficient for batteries to just deliver moderate power for a long time, but also support pulse power applications i.e., deliver high power for short periods. Batteries need to support boost mode for hybrid vehicles, x-by-wire technologies, idle stop mode for mild hybrid vehicles, and cranking of a conventional motor vehicle. Hence, a reliable prediction of a vehicle’s power capability is expected from the BMS integrated into it. For safety-critical steer-by-wire and brake-by-wire applications, the user must get an early warning when the battery leaves its safe operating area due to aging or insufficient charging. An intelligent energy management system estimates the state variables of the vehicular battery system so that necessary measures can be taken [99].

Robinson et al. successfully demonstrated the utilization of system noise as an excitation signal to carry out EIS studies of batteries connected to operating equipment. However, they implemented the offline Fourier transform method to obtain the impedance spectrum of the battery system and did not interpret the recorded impedance spectra, in their work [100]. Bohlen and Gelbke presented a procedure to directly determine the pulse power capability of battery systems based on its impedance model, without the need for difficult-to-determine state variables like SoC and SoH. Parameters of the derived impedance model can be calculated during normal operation of the vehicle by evaluating the dynamic behavior of the battery. This methodology was lab-tested and a prototype was implemented towards the prognosis of cranking capability in a conventional motor vehicle [99]. Wang et al. designed a low cost, small sized on-board EIS measurement system for LiBs, suitable for vehicle applications, to investigate relation between SoC, SoH, internal temperature and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [101].

Zhao et al. developed and experimentally evaluated a low-cost LabVIEW-based EIS measurement system, within the frequency range of interest for EV batteries [102]. Gong et al. developed a novel, optimized integrated circuit (IC) to carry out cell-level EIS measurements, with a peak perturbation current of 200 mA and also proposed a hybrid power architecture to improve the signal processing capabilities of the IC while increasing the perturbation range [103]. Decrease in performance of EV battery at low temperatures, greatly affects the vehicle’s driving range. Nemati et al. carried out EIS studies on vehicular LiBs and investigated their cycle life and calendar life for different operating temperatures varying from 55°C to –20°C [104]. Li et al. proposed a real-time method for monitoring of battery impedance with DC current using three-phase motor drive inverter [105].

Wang et al. proposed a new method to establish a nonlinear battery model from the EIS data and identify model parameters in the frequency domain, aimed at the BMS application of EVs [106]. Zhang et al. developed a series electrochemical impedance model for quantitative analysis of internal processes occurring inside LiBs, in EV applications [107]. Jiang et al. analyzed the impedance spectrum of large LiBs used in EVs and developed a charge polarization model for them, estimating parameters like ohmic and charge transfer resistances [108]. A major issue faced by LiBs is lithium plating i.e. deposition of lithium on the anode surface of battery under low-temperature and fast-charging conditions, drastically reducing their life and fast-charging capability and causing internal shorts [109]. Tsioumas et al. proposed and experimentally verified an impedance spectroscopy-based lithium plating diagnostic method for several battery charging and temperature operating conditions [110].

A lot of research has been going on towards improving the monitoring of SoC and SoH as these are pertinent aspects for EV usage and their battery management system (BMS) throughout the lifetime of operation. Remmlinger et al. monitored the SoH parameter for a LiB used in a hybrid vehicle with the help of a special-purpose model, obtained from an equivalent electric circuit derived from the battery’s impedance data [111]. Barre et al. carried out statistical analysis of recorded capacity fade and resistance increase data, for aging LiBs used in EVs [112]. Farooq et al. developed a low-cost, high voltage EIS instrument to measure the impedance of LiB module upto 100 V, for estimation of RUL of EV batteries [113]. Rastegarpanah et al. demonstrated a model-free neural network-based approach for SoH estimation based on a dataset of impedance spectroscopy measurements, for end-of-first life EV batteries [114]. EIS has to be performed at module level in EVs since most extracted modules from EVs have little to no access to individual cells. Savca et al. studied the reliability of EIS measurements done at the module level and the amount of information of each cell reflected on module measurement while determining elements sensitive to SoH [11].

Babaeiyazdi et al. implemented an ML approach for accurate estimation of SoC of LiBs for onboard BMS applications in EVs, by employing impedance spectroscopy measurements in linear regression and Gaussian process regression (GPR) models [115]. For accurate estimation of SoC in EVs and HEVs, Wang et al. integrated the EIS technique into BMS and developed a new model updating strategy based on EIS for SoC estimation, with a focus on aging batteries [116]. Resting time of a battery during its charging and discharging processes affects EIS measurements carried out on the battery. SoC and SoH values estimated for a battery vary significantly if EIS measurements are recorded without taking resting time into consideration [117]. Li et al. measured EIS spectra at a constant SoC for different resting times and studied the effect of resting time on the impedance behavior of LiBs used in EVs [118].

CHALLENGES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EIS TECHNIQUE IN EV BATTERY SYSTEMS

Unlike most other diagnostic methods, EIS methodology provides a powerful and unique approach to obtain a deeper look into degradation processes in batteries such as loss of lithium plating, electrolyte breakdown, and electrode corrosion. This technology offers early detection capabilities for battery degradation before it manifests as significant performance drops or safety concerns in the vehicle, thus facilitating preventive maintenance strategies to be implemented, potentially extending a battery system’s lifespan, ensuring its optimal health and safety, and improving overall EV safety. Automotive applications involve harsh environments with temperature variations, vibrations, and electrical noise. Implementing impedance spectroscopy equipment that can withstand these conditions without compromising accuracy and reliability is a major challenge to overcome. Developing impedance spectroscopy systems compact enough to be integrated onboard an automotive vehicle, without compromising its performance is another technological drawback that is being explored. With the advancements in EIS-based techniques, the use of EIS in BMS in real-time has become possible. But the challenges remain in standardizing measurement techniques and integrating them into existing battery management systems, which may limit its widespread adoption in the industry.

While the advancements in EIS-based estimation techniques show great promise, challenges remain in standardizing methods across different battery chemistries and operating conditions, which could affect the generalizability of these approaches. A major limitation of the EIS technique lies in ambiguity in the ECM derived and its interpretation. Analyzing EIS spectra requires expertise and hence, can limit accessibility and slow down characterization studies. Also, distinguishing between two electrochemical processes with similar time constant values is a challenge with EIS implementation. Distribution of Relaxation Times (DRT) analysis, though helpful in identifying a suitable ECM for the impedance data, is limited to resistive-capacitive elements, and requires data pre-processing. Also, since DRT analysis requires a numerical matrix inversion, results depend on the method chosen for the inversion [119]. Furthermore, although useful in some cases, impedance being strongly dependent on temperature and other state variables is another major drawback; control or at the very least, knowledge of conditions under which measurements are made becomes a necessity [33]. Distinguishing between the effects of temperature and other factors like SoC or aging on the EIS spectra is a difficult task.

The inconsistency of battery degradation makes it difficult to monitor the health of a battery system, and for big battery packs, diagnosis becomes too expensive and resource-intensive. To verify the interpretation of commercial cell impedance measurements in the context of EIS battery management, harvested cathode or anode electrodes must be reassembled in a symmetric two-electrode cell configuration. By comparing the commercial cell impedance with that of the symmetric lab-scale cells produced with collected materials, one can assess the specific contribution of each electrode to the overall impedance spectrum of the LiB. Electrodes taken from aged cells are used to do repeated symmetric cell measurements under various situations, allowing a proper validation of aging effects. Hence, validating the interpretation of EIS measurements of commercial LiBs is a complex task and several factors affect reliable data collection [120].

Recording impedance at lower frequencies being highly time-consuming is a potential hindrance to realtime EIS implementation in battery systems. In the single-sine EIS method, wherein the impedance of the battery is measured sequentially from high to low frequencies, obtaining measurements at low and very low frequencies takes a long time, hours or in extreme cases, even days to obtain the whole spectrum. Although the multi-sine EIS approach addresses this problem by obtaining measurements at multiple frequencies at the same time, the signal-to-noise ratio is typically lower for this method, as compared to the single-sine method.

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK

This review explores the basic principles of EIS technique and applications of EIS in EV battery studies. Within the realm of battery-operated EVs, EIS is utilized for various applications. It has been successfully employed in real-time monitoring and prognosis of battery health in EVs. This spectroscopic technique offers a process-oriented understanding of battery health, while data-driven methods excel at large-scale data analysis and prediction. EIS data can be used as inputs to calibrate the parameters of physics-based or data-driven battery models and also to validate the model’s accuracy and reliability. To achieve efficient management of batteries, a more comprehensive and informative strategy is to combine this technique with the other approaches. Large datasets of EIS spectral data along with voltage, current and temperature data, when combined with AI/ML can provide enhanced prognostic and diagnostic functions for EV batteries. EIS technique can also play a pivotal role in the integration of EVs with vehicle-to-grid systems, the development of advanced materials for EV components such as electrodes, electrolytes, and current collectors, and also in optimizing wireless charging systems for EVs; intensive research needs to be carried out in these domains. Continued research and development are needed to realize the full potential of EIS in advancing the future of electric mobility.

References

1. Rhyu J, Zhuang D, Bazant M. Z, Braatz R. D. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2024;171(7):070544.
2. Li Z, Shi X, Shi M, Wei C, Di F, Sun H. 2020 Asia Energy and Electrical Engineering Symposium (AEEES) Chengdu, China: 2020. p. 753–757.
3. Sun Z, He W, Wang J, He X. Energies 2024;17(11):2487.
4. Braco E, Martin I. S, Sanchis P, Ursúa A, Stroe D.-I. J. Energy Storage 2022;55:105366.
5. Azizighalehsari S, Popovic J, Venugopal P, Ferreira B. In : IECON 2021 – 47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. Toronto, ON, Canada; 2021. p. 1–6.
6. Rezvanizaniani S. M, Liu Z, Chen Y, Lee J. J. Power Sources 2014;256:110–124.
7. Din E, Schaef C, Moffat K, Stauth J. T. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2017;32(7):5688–5698.
8. Leduc H, Okamura R, Kyeyune-Nyombi E, Huynh K, Chung S. Meet. Abstr. 2020;MA2020-02:1584.
9. Křivík P, Vaculík S, Bača P, Kazelle J. J. Energy Storage 2019;21:581–585.
10. Liu Y, Wang L, Li D, Wang K. Prot. Control Mod. Power Syst. 2023;8:41.
11. A. Savca, Application of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) on Module Level Li-ion Batteries for Echelon Utilization, Bachelor, University of Twente Enschede, 2022.
12. Pollet B. G, Staffell I, Shang J. L, Molkov V. Fuel-cell (hydrogen) electric hybrid vehicles, in: Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicle Technologies for Improved Environmental Performance Woodhead Publishing,; 2014. p. 685–735.
13. Pereirinha P. G. Electric vehicles. In : García J, ed. Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronic Power Engineering Elsevier; 2023. p. 350–387.
14. Delucchi M. A, Lipman T. E. Lifetime cost of battery, fuel-cell, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, in: Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: Power Sources, Models, Sustainability, Infrastructure and the Market Elsevier; 2010. p. 19–60.
15. Narayanaswamy S, Schlueter S, Steinhorst S, Lukasiewycz M, Chakraborty S, Hoster H. ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst. 2016;21(4):60.
16. Abe T, Fukuda H, Iriyama Y, Ogumi Z. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004;151:A1120.
17. Garche J, Moseley P. T, Karden E. 5 - Lead–acid batteries for hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles. In : Scrosati B, Garche J, Tillmetz W, eds. Advances in Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles Woodhead Publishing; 2015. p. 75–101.
18. Fetcenko M, Koch J, Zelinsky M. 6 - Nickel–metal hydride and nickel–zinc batteries for hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles. In : Scrosati B, Garche J, Tillmetz W, eds. Advances in Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles Woodhead Publishing; 2015. p. 103–126.
19. Abdin Z, Khalilpour K. R. Khalilpour, Single and polystorage technologies for renewable-based hybrid energy systems, in: Polygeneration with Polystorage for Chemical and Energy Hubs Elsevier; 2018. p. 77–131.
20. Neupert S, Kowal J. Batteries 2023;9(7):364.
21. Messing M, Shoa T, Habibi S. In : Lithium-Ion Battery Relaxation Effects, 2019 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC). Detroit, MI, USA; 2019. p. 1–6.
22. Pérez A, Benavides M, Rozas H, Seria S, Orchard M. Int. J. Progn. Heal. Manag. 2018. 9(3)
23. Gan L, Yang F, Shi Y. F, He H. L. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2017;94:012133.
24. Meng X, Cai C, Wang Y, Wang Q, Tan L. Front. Energy Res. 2022;10:1–14.
25. Temiz S, Erol S, Kurban H, Dalkilic M. M. J. Energy Storage 2023;64:107085.
26. Barcellona S, Colnago S, Dotelli G, Latorrata S, Piegari L. J. Energy Storage 2022;50:104658.
27. Shen J, Ma W, Shu X, Shen S, Chen Z, Liu Y. Energy 2023;279:128092.
28. Reshma P, Manohar V. J. J. Energy Storage 2023;68:107573.
29. Middlemiss L. A, Rennie A. J. R, Sayers R, West A. R. Energy Reports 2020;6(S5):232–241.
30. Sneha M, Afijith N, Murugesan N, Jayaraman V. Org. Electron. 2022;113:106698.
31. Ravindranath S. M, N. A, Jayaraman V. Research Square 2023;doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3107887/v1.
32. Blanco C, Anseán D, García V. M, Ferrero F, Valledor M. Measurement 2017;106:1–11.
33. Meddings N, Heinrich M, Overney F, Lee J.-S, Ruiz V, Napolitano E, Seitz S, Hids G, Raccichini R, Gaberšček M, Park J. J. Power Sources 2020;480:228742.
34. Li Y, Maleki M, Banitaan S. J. Energy Storage 2023;73:109185.
35. Agudelo B. O, Zamboni W, Monmasson E, Spagnuolo G. O In : Identification of battery circuit model from EIS data, Conférence des Jeunes Chercheurs en Génie Electrique (JCGE 2019), Jun 2019. Saint Pierre d’Oléron, France. hal02915697.
36. Andre D, Meiler M, Steiner K, Walz H, Soczka-Guth T, Sauer D. U. J. Power Sources 2011;196(12):5349–5356.
37. Eddahech A, Briat O, Woirgard E, Vinassa J. M. Microelectron. Reliab. 2012;52(9–10):2438–2442.
38. Zenati A, Desprez P, Razik H. In : Estimation of the SOC and the SOH of li-ion batteries, by combining impedance measurements with the fuzzy logic inference, IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. Glendale, USA; 2010. p. 1773–1778.
39. Haiying W, Long H, Jianhua S, Shuanquan L, Feng W. In : Proceedings of 2011 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology. Harbin, China; 2011. p. 261–264.
40. Mingant R, Bernard J, Moynot V. S, Delaille A, Mailley S. ECS Trans. 2011;33:41.
41. Balagopal B, Chow M.-Y. In : The state of the art approaches to estimate the state of health (SOH) and state of function (SOF) of lithium Ion batteries, 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). Cambridge, UK; 2015. p. 1302–1307.
42. Ge M.-F, Liu Y, Jiang X, Liu J. Measurement 2021;174:109057.
43. Wang J, Zhang L, Xu D, Zhang P, Zhang G. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2019;(1):6019236.
44. Chen X, Geng M, Wang Q, Shen J, He Y, Ma Z. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2022;11(9):2995–3002.
45. Hammouche A, Karden E, De Doncker R. W. J. Power Sources 2004;127(1–2):105–111.
46. Tröltzsch O, Kanoun O, Tränkler H.-R. Electrochim. Acta 2006;51(8–9):1664–1672.
47. Chen H. C, Chou S. R, Chen H. C, Wu S. L, Chen L. R. In : Fast Estimation of State of Charge for Lithium-Ion Battery, 2014 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control. Taichung, taiwan; 2014. p. 284–287.
48. Wang X, Wei X, Dai H. J. Energy Storage 2019;21:618–631.
49. Cruz-Manzo S, Greenwood P, Chen R. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017;164(7):A1446.
50. Lyu C, Zhang T, Luo W, Wei G, Ma B, Wang L. In : SOH Estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on fast time domain impedance spectroscopy, 2019 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). Xi'an, China; 2019. p. 2142–2147.
51. Gücin T. N, Ovacik L. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020;35(4):4365–4375.
52. Messing M, Shoa T, Habibi S. J. Energy Storage 2021;43:103210.
53. Xi Y, Liu Y, Xing Y, Dong M, Chen R. In : SOC estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and equivalent circuit model, 22nd International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH 2021). Xi'an, China; 2021. p. 2225–2229.
54. Ezpeleta I, Freire L, Mateo-Mateo C, Nóvoa X. R, Pintos A, Valverde-Pérez S. ChemistrySelect 2022;7(10)e202104464.
55. Mohsin M, Picot A, Maussion P. J. Energy Storage 2022;52:104647.
56. Tonima M. A, DeHart A, Tabakci D, Tisapramotkul P, Munro-West A, Mehra A, Shoa T. In : Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and machine learning based battery state of health (SoH) estimation, 2023 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM). Montreal, Canada; 2023. p. 212–223.
57. Li Q, Yi D, Dang G, Zhao H, Lu T, Wang Q, Lai C, Xie J. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023;14(12):321.
58. Anekal L, Williamson S. In : Adaptive battery state-of-charge estimation using aging-driven equivalent circuit parameterization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, 2024 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC). Chicago, USA; 2024. p. 1–6.
59. Liu R, Zhang D, Li Z, Bauer P, Qin Z. In : Feature extraction from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries under different temperatures, 2024 IEEE 10th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2024-ECCE Asia). Chengdu, China; 2024. p. 3374–3378.
60. Xia B, Qin Z, Fu H. J. Power Sources 2024;603:234413.
61. Mingant R, Bernard J, Sauvant-Moynot V. World Electr. Veh. J. 2012;5(2):405–411.
62. Guha A, Patra A. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2018;67(8):1836–1849.
63. Li J, Zhao S, Miah M. S, Niu M. Energy Rep. 2023;10:3629–3638.
64. Ma S, Jian M, Tao P, Song C, Wu J, Wang J, Deng T, Shang W. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2018;28(6):653–666.
65. Ji Y, Zhang Y, Wang C.-Y. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013;160(4):A636–A649.
66. Zhang S. S, Xu K, Jow T. R. Electrochim. Acta 2004;49(7):1057–1061.
67. Ahmed S. H, Kang X, Shrestha S. O. B. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(3):031901.
68. Beelen H. P. G. J, Raijmakers L. H. J, Donkers M. C. F, Notten P. H. L, Bergveld H. J. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015;48(15):383–388.
69. Nelatury S. R, Singh P. J. Power Sources 2002;112(2):621–625.
70. Nelatury S. R, Singh P. J. Power Sources 2004;132(1–2):309–314.
71. Jespersen J. L, Tønnesen A. E, Nørregaard K, Overgaard L, Elefsen F. World Electr. Veh. J. 2009;3(1):127–133.
72. Ogihara N, Kawauchi S, Okuda C, Itou Y, Takeuchi Y, Ukyo Y. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012;159(7):A1034–A1039.
73. Ogihara N, Itou Y, Sasaki T, Takeuchi Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015;119(9):4612–4619.
74. Itagaki M, Honda K, Hoshi Y, Shitanda I. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015;737:78–84.
75. Scipioni R, Jørgensen P. S, Graves C, Hjelm J, Jensen S. H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017;164(9):A2017–A2030.
76. Ogihara N, Itou Y, Kawauchi S. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019;10(17):5013–5018.
77. Fang J, Shen W, Cheng S. H. S, Ghashghaie S, Shahzad H. K, Chung C. Y. J. Power Sources 2019;441:227202.
78. Zhang Y, Tang Q, Zhang Y, Wang J, Stimming U, Lee A. A. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1706.
79. Kuipers M, Schröer P, Nemeth T, Zappen H, Blömeke A, Sauer D. U. J. Energy Storage 2020;30:101517.
80. Crescentini M, Angelis A. D, Ramilli R, Angelis G. D, Tartagni M, Moschitta A, Traverso P. A, Carbone P. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021;70:1–11.
81. Ma R, He J, Deng Y. J. Energy Storage 2022;54:105346.
82. Guo J, Jin S, Sui X, Huang X, Xu Y, Li Y, Kristensen P. K, Wang D, Pedersen K, Gurevich L, Stroe D.-I. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023;11:41–52.
83. Jiang J, Lin Z, Ju Q, Ma Z, Zheng C, Wang Z. Energy Procedia 2017;105:844–849.
84. Schmitt J, Maheshwari A, Heck M, Lux S, Vetter M. J. Power Sources 2017;353:183–194.
85. Teliz E, Zinola C. F, Díaz V. Electrochim. Acta 2022;426:140801.
86. Xu Z, Li H, Yazdi M, Ouyang K, Peng W. Electronics 2022;11(23):3863.
87. Liu P, Zhang W, Liu X, Zhang Y, Wu F. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018;452(3):32088.
88. Abe Y, Hori N, Kumagai S. Energies 2019;12(23):4507.
89. Leduc H, Okamura R, Kyeyune-Nyombi E, Huynh K, Chung S. ECS Meet Abstr 2020;MA2020-02:1584.
90. Plett G. L. J. Power Sources 2004;134(2):252–261.
91. Zhang J, Zhang L, Sun F, Wang Z. IEEE Access 2018;6:23848–23863.
92. Chen C, Wei Z, Knoll A. C. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022;8(3):3068–3089.
93. Kirchev A. Battery Management and Battery Diagnostics. In : Moseley P. T, Garche J, eds. Electrochemical Energy Storage for Renewable Sources and Grid Balancing Elsevier; 2015. p. 411–435.
94. Olarte J, Zulueta E, Ferret R, Fernández-Gámiz U, Lopez-Guede J. M. Electronics 2021;10(11):12281.
95. Simatupang D, Benshatti A, Park S.-Y. In : Embedded Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy into Battery Management System, ECON 2021 – 47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. Toronto, ON, Canada; 2021. p. 1–6.
96. Murbach M. D, Hu V. W, Schwartz D. T. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018;165(11):A2758–A2765.
97. Liebhart B, Satzke M, Komsiyska L, Endisch C. J. Power Sources 2020;480:228673.
98. Kirk T. L, Lewis-Douglas A, Howey D, Please C. P. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2023;170:010514.
99. Bohlen O, Buller S, De Doncker R. W, Gelbke M, Naumann R. In : Impedance based battery diagnosis for automotive applications, 2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551). Aachen, Germany; 2004. 4p. 2792–2797.
100. Robinson R. S. J. Power Sources 1993;42(3):381–388.
101. Wang X, Wei X, Dai H, Wu Q. In : State Estimation of Lithium Ion Battery Based on Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy with On-Board Impedance Measurement System, 2015 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC). Montreal, QC, Canada; 2015. p. 1–5.
102. Zhao L, Fu Q, Liu Z. In : An electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurement system for electric vehicle batteries, 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). Chengdu, China; 2016. p. 5050–5055.
103. Gong Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, Gupta K, da Silva C, Liu T, Zheng Z. H, Zheng W. P, van Lammeren J. P. M, Bergveld H. J, Amon C. H, Trescases O. In : 2018 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), San Antonio. TX, USA; 2018. p. 1922–1929.
104. Nemati A. B, Mousavi-Khoshdel S. M, Molaeimanesh G. R, Ebrahimi-Nejad S. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2021;146:665–672.
105. Li B, Qu H, Zhou M, Jiang D. In : 2023 25th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’23 ECCE Europe). Aalborg, Denmark; 2023. p. 1–6.
106. Wang X, Dai H, Jiang B. In : 2018 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC). Chicago, IL, USA; 2018. p. 1–6.
107. Zhang Q, Wang D, Yang B, Dong H, Zhu C, Hao Z. J. Energy Storage 2022;50:104182.
108. Jiang Y, Zhang C, Zhang W, Shi W, Liu Q. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2013;6(2):686–697.
109. Lin X, Khosravinia K, Hu X, Li J, Lu W. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2021;87:100953.
110. Tsioumas E, Jabbour N, Papagiannis D, Koseoglou M, Mademlis C. In : 2023 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED). Chania, Greece; 2023. p. 291–296.
111. Remmlinger J, Buchholz M, Meiler M, Bernreuter P, Dietmayer K. J. Power Sources 2011;196(12):5357–5363.
112. Barré A, Suard F, Gérard M, Montaru M, Riu D. J. Power Sources 2014;245:846–856.
113. Farooq F, Khan A. N, June L. S, Choi W. In : Development of the high voltage EIS instrument for the evaluation of the residual useful life of the batteries, in: 2019 Prodeeding of the Korean Institute of Power Electronics Power Electronics Conference. Seoul; 2019. p. 216–217.
114. Rastegarpanah A, Hathaway J, Stolkin R. Energies 2021;14(9):2597.
115. Babaeiyazdi I, Rezaei-Zare A, Shokrzadeh S. Energy 2021;223:120116.
116. Wang L, Zhao X, Deng Z, Yang L. J. Energy Storage 2023;57:106275.
117. Ivers-Tiffée E, Weber A. J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 2017;125(4):193–201.
118. Li Q, Yi D, Dang G, Zhao H, Lu T, Wang Q, Lai C, Xie J. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023;14(12):321.
119. Goldammer E, Kowal J. Batteries 2021;7(2):36.
120. Balasingam B, Ahmed M, Pattipati K. Energies 2020;13(11):2825.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Schematic of a battery.

Fig. 2.

Typical Nyquist plot of a Lithium-ion cell along with the derived equivalent electrical circuit [35].

Fig. 3.

(a) EIS curves at different values of SoC [43] and (b) EIS curves at different values of SoH for LiB [44].

Fig. 4.

EIS spectrum at different SoC for a (a) fresh cell and an (b) aged cell [82].

Table 1.

Summary table for NEVs

Type of NEV Power source Driving component Features
BEV 1. Battery 1. Electric motor Battery can be charged with charging equipment, or through regenerative braking.
2. Ultra capacitor Typical driving range is 150 to 400 miles.
HEV 1. Battery 1. Electric motor Off-board sources of electricity cannot be used to charge battery.
2. Ultra capacitor 2. ICE Battery can be charged only through regenerative braking.
3. Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)
PHEV 1. Battery 1. Electric motor Battery can be charged with charging equipment, or through regenerative braking.
2. Ultra capacitor 2. ICE In all-electric mode, typical driving range is 20 to 40 miles.
3. ICE
FCEV 1. Fuel cell 1. Electric motor Fuel cells do not need recharging; they can generate electricity as long as fuel supply (e.g. hydrogen) is available.
Regenerative braking system along with battery for storage is also implemented.
Typical driving range is more than 300 miles.

Table 2.

Application of EIS towards battery state estimation

Publication Methodology Parameters studied Battery type
Hammouche et al. [45] Series resonance frequency, which can be deduced from a battery’s impedance spectra, was found to be an effective parameter for routine monitoring of SoC of tested batteries; series resonance frequency was found to have a monotonous and reproducible dependency on battery SoC. SoC LiB
Tröltzsch et al. [46] Correlation of resistance parameters in equivalent electrical circuit models derived from impedance spectra with SoH values. SoH LiB
Chen et al. [47] Implementation of a fast measurement method to estimate SoC. SoC LiB
Wang et al. [48] Estimation of SoH from charge transfer resistance of a battery, obtained by fitting its impedance data with an equivalent impedance model, along with derivation and verification of an analytical calculation model. SoH LiB
Manzo et al. [49] Modeling of impedance for EIS study of battery, in order to gain insight into electrochemical mechanisms happening inside a battery. SoC and SoH NiMH battery
Yang et al. [43] Development of simplified fractional order impedance model and the corresponding parameter identification method based on least square genetic algorithm. SoC LiB
Lyu et al. [50] Implementation of fast time domain impedance spectroscopy. SoH LiB
Krivik et al. [9] Estimation of SoC from open circuit voltage, and internal impedance of battery SoC Lead-acid battery
Gucin et al. [51] Online EIS based on cross-correlation technique applied to a boost-type dc-dc charge controller for batteries. SoC and SoH Lead-acid battery
Messing et al. [52] Development of empirical model based on battery relaxation effect and EIS measurements. SoH LiB
Xi et al. [53] Implementation of fractional order circuit model. SoC LiB
Ezpeleta et al. [54] Development of a novel electrical equivalent circuit model SoC and SoH LiB
Mohsin et al. [55] Proposal of a dependable formula to link SoH and EIS for second life of car batteries in rural electrification systems. SoH Lead-acid battery
Tonima et al. [56] Combined implementation of an XGBoost-based ML approach with EIS technique. SoH LiB
Temiz et al. [25] Implementation of a data-centric ML framework to construct and predict a wide range of impedance spectra using experimental EIS data for different SoC and surrounding temperature conditions. SoC LiB
Li et al. [34] Combined implementation of transfer learning with deep neural networks, along with EIS measurement data. SoH LiB
Li et al. [57] Detailed study of relationship between EIS and SoC, along with importance of resting time in impedance analysis. SoC LiB
Chen et al. [44] Estimation method with feature selection and Gaussian process regression for improved performance. SoH LiB
Anekal et al. [58] Estimation of SoC using an adaptive extended Kalman filter based on the parameters obtained from EIS. SoC LiB
Liu et al. [59] Development of an accurate model for SoH estimation that is uniquely characterized by using only the imaginary part of impedance at a specific frequency SoH LiB
Xia et al. [60] Development of a novel approach using partial EIS and interpretable machine learning for rapid and precise battery health state estimation. SoH LiB
Mingant et al. [40] Prediction algorithms based on multivariate mathematical analysis. SoC and SoH LiB
Mingant et al. [61] Virtual sensor technology SoH LiB
Guha et al. [62] EIS measurement based on a fractional-order equivalent circuit model (FOECM). RUL LiB
Li et al. [63] EIS-based deep learning approach RUL LiB

Table 3.

Application of EIS towards temperature studies in batteries

Research work Impedance studies done Battery type
Zhang et al. [66] Evaluation of dependence of battery impedance on its SoC, by carrying out EIS studies over the temperature range of −20°C to 45°C. LiB
Ahmed et al. [67] Study of individual effects of temperature on cathode interfacial, anode interfacial and conductive resistances, over the temperature range of –30°C to 50°C. LiB
Beelen et al. [68] Impedance spectroscopy-based temperature estimation to obtain a more accurate temperature estimate than the previously existing methods. LiB

Table 4.

Application of EIS towards battery characterization

Research work Research carried out Battery type
Nelatury et al. [69] Extraction of equivalent circuit parameters from sparse impedance data obtained at only three frequencies. Lead acid battery
Abe et al. [16] Investigation of solvated lithium-ion transfer at graphite/electrolyte interface of battery. LiB
Nelatury et al. [70] Extraction of equivalent circuit parameters from sparse impedance data obtained at six frequencies. NiMH battery
Jespersen et al. [71] EIS characterization of battery at different temperatures and discharge rates and study on using EIS as a tool for estimating battery capacity. LiB
Ogihara et al. [72] Implementation of a new analytical approach, combining transmission line model theory and EIS using symmetric cells, to analyse porous electrode/ electrolyte interface of battery. LiB
Ogihara et al. [73] Investigation of dependence of internal resistance of porous electrodes of battery with high loading weight, on its thickness. LiB
Itagaki et al. [74] Study of charge transfer resistance of positive and negative electrodes of battery by carrying out simultaneous impedance measurements with an in-situ EIS setup. LiB
Scipioni et al. [75] Development of Equivalent Circuit Model (ECM) for battery from its impedance data to characterize its cathode and anode electrodes separately. LiB
Ogihara et al. [76] Analysis of impedance of a symmetric cell with predictable low temperature performance, along with derivation of a parameter quantitatively describing ion transport in its porous electrodes. LiB
Fang etal. [77] Analysis of resistances of individual cell components using a novel four-electrode symmetric setup. LiB
Middlemiss et al. [29] Assessment of separate contributions by anodic and cathodic impedances, by conducting impedance spectroscopy studies on a novel in-house, three-electrode cell. LiB
Zhang et al. [78] Combination of EIS with Gaussian process ML for building an accurate battery forecasting system. LiB
Kuipers et al. [79] Implementation of a novel algorithm for Online Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (OEIS). LiB
Crescentini et al. [80] Implementation of a compact measurement system for EIS, combining vector impedance analyzer and state parameter estimation. LiB
Ma et al. [81] Comparison of EIS technique and Recursive Least Square (RLS) algorithm, in identification of battery’s internal short circuit for safety. LiB

Table 5.

Implementation of EIS towards study of battery degradation and ageing

Research work Research carried out Battery type
Jiang et al. [83] Demonstration of relationship between electrochemical impedance and capacity of aging batteries. LiB
Schmitt et al. [84] Investigation of capacity loss and impedance rise due to calendar aging. LiB
Perez et al. [22] Outline of guidelines for algorithms to adhere to when utilizing battery’s internal impedance to characterize its degradation. LiB
Teliz et al. [85] Implementation of EIS-based strategy for identifying and measuring aging mechanisms. LiB
Xu et al. [86] Estimation of SoH and study of aging characteristics for retired batteries. LiB
Barcellona et al. [26] Estimation of variation law of internal resistance of battery as function of its SoC and temperature, for different aging conditions, by Galvanostatic EIS. LiB
Liu et al. [87] A new semicircular arc was found in the low-mid frequency region of impedance spectrum indicating performance degradation. LiB
Abe et al. [88] Correlation of increased charge-transfer resistance with performance degradation in a battery undergoing charge-discharge cycling at different C-rates. LiB

Table 6.

Application of EIS towards BMS

Research work Research carried out Battery type
Din et al. [7] Implementation of a scalable active BMS with real-time diagnostic capability, with EIS technique. LiB
Olarte et al. [94] Integration of BMS with battery-block sensor for online monitoring of cell temperature, voltage and impedance spectra. Lead acid battery
Simatupang et al. [95] Integration of EIS in BMS with a reduced number of components, to equalize SoC of battery and to internally heat batteries during winter. LiB

Table 7.

Nonlinear EIS implementation in battery studies

Research publication Research carried out Battery type
Murbach et al. [96] Demonstration of first full-frequency, second harmonic studies of NLEIS spectra of battery. LiB
Liebhart et al. [97] Impedance data evaluated by applying different compressive force conditions to battery. LiB
Kirk et al. [98] Analysis of NLEIS response and estimation of model parameters from impedance data of battery. LiB