Reuse of the Surrounding Powder Used as a Na-Source in the Fabrication of Sodium-Beta-Alumina Solid Electrolyte by Vapor-Phase Conversion Method

Article information

J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2024;15(4):484-494
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 May 22
doi : https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2024.00374
1Department of Materials Chemistry and Engineering, Konkuk University, 120, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, South Korea
2Battery Materials Division, Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology (RIST), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
*E-mail address: sklim@konkuk.ac.kr
Received 2024 April 12; Accepted 2024 May 21.

Abstract

While Na/NiCl2 secondary batteries offer high safety and excellent performance, their high price inhibits their commercialization. Two approaches are proposed to solve this problem: (1) automatic production by making cells of a flat plate structure and (2) lowering the price of sodium-beta-alumina solid electrolyte (BASE), a key component. In general, a thin and wide disk-type BASE for a planar Na/NiCl2 battery is prepared from zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) by a vapor-phase conversion (VPC) process. In the process, Na-β″-Al2O3 powder, which is usually used as surrounding powder to supply sodium, is used once, then discarded. In this study, two methods were attempted to reduce the BASE cost fabricated by the VPC process. The first is the reuse of the surrounding powder in the VPC. The number of reuses has been up to three times. The second is that the surrounding powder is used as-is by mixing raw material powders, that is α-Al2O3, Na2-CO3, and Li2CO3, instead of Na-β″-Al2O3 powder. This allows omission of the calcination process required for Na-β″-Al2O3 synthesis. Furthermore, the properties of the BASE prepared by VPC with the reused surrounding powder were analyzed, and their changes were investigated.

1. Introduction

The NaNiCl2 secondary battery with high energy density and charge/discharge efficiency is used for the large capacity energy storage system (ESS). The Na/NiCl2 battery is therefore an ideal choice for the next-generation battery, as it offers an effective solution to the safety problem of the lithium ion battery (LIB). The Na/NiCl2 battery consists of nickel and sodium chloride as cathode electrode, sodium metal as anode electrode, and a ceramic solid electrolyte made from sodium ion-conducting Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 (BASE). This means that there is no risk of fire from side reactions during cell operation, since the resulting product is NaCl. Moreover, the cost of the active materials is low, due to their abundant reserves [1,2]. While the Na/NiCl2 battery has several benefits, their manufacturing costs are more expensive than the LIB. Since ceramic solid electrolyte is used, the operating temperature is high, at above 300°C or so. Therefore, the price of the battery parts is very high, because parts of the cell need to be heat-resistant [3,4].

To reduce the operating temperature, the thickness of the BASE needs to be reduced to achieve high sodium ion conductivity, even at low temperatures. However, in the conventional design of the Na/NiCl2 battery, specifically the tubular type, it was necessary to reduce the thickness of BASE through costly post-processing steps after sintering. To address these issues, research is underway to modify the battery design to a planar type (Fig. 1), and manufacture the BASE in the form of a thin disk, aiming to overcome the challenges associated with the high post-processing costs in the tubular design [57].

Fig. 1

The 5 Wh class planar Na/NiCl2 battery cell (left) and its major components (right) [13].

To manufacture a thin BASE, it is necessary to produce a precursor material, zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA), in a thin form, and subsequently fabricate it using a method termed vapor phase conversion (VPC), supplying sodium ions at temperatures below 1450°C [812].

The BASE is a sodium ion conductor that has high ionic conductivity. It consists of two distinctive phases: β-Al2O3 (NaAl 11O17) and β″-Al 2O3 (NaAl5O8); Fig. 2 shows that because of the different structures and sodium contents, the ionic conductivity of the β″-Al2O3 is 3−10 times higher than that of the β-Al2O3 [1318]. The BASE is synthesized through various process, such as the solid state reaction, sol–gel process, and VPC.

Fig. 2

Crystal structure of the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3: (a) Na+-β-Al2O3, (b) Na+-β″-Al2O3 [19].

The solid state reaction is widely used commercially because of its suitability for mass production. However, due to the high sintering temperature of 1600°C or higher, the vapor pressure of Na2O is relatively high, and significant loss of Na2O can occur through the vapor phase.

In addition, it is vulnerable to atmospheric moisture and CO2 due to the formation of NaAlO2 secondary phase. The reaction between the interfacial NaAlO2 and moisture involves dissolution, while the reaction with CO2 involves the formation of Na2-CO3. In both cases, cracking and delamination occur along the grain boundaries.

The sol–gel process has limitations for industrialization, due to the decreased mechanical strength and high cost associated with raw materials and synthesis [20].

The vapor phase conversion reacts solid α-Al2O3 with Na2O in the vapor phase to form Na+-β/β″-Al2O3. The Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 that forms on the surface of α-Al2O3 acts as a good Na+ ion conductor. Although Na+ ions can quickly diffuse through the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3, O2− ions diffuse very slowly through Na+-β/β″-Al2O3. Therefore, pure α-Al2O3 is not used as a precursor for VPC when preparing Na+-β/β″-Al2O3. As known, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) provides a fast route for O2− ion transport. When using the α-Al2O3/YSZ sintered composite (i.e. ZTA), it allows coupled diffusion of Na+ through the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3, and O2− through YSZ, thus facilitating phase conversion to Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 [21]. Fig. 3 shows the VPC process. The VPC process can improve the disadvantages of the two methods described above, and can be manufactured in the form of a thin film, making it suitable as a solid electrolyte for medium-to low-temperature planar cells below 200°C.

Fig. 3

(a) Schematic illustration and (b) SEM imagery of the cross-sectional surface morphology of the conversion process from α-alumina/YSZ composite to Na+-β/β″-alumina/YSZ composite electrolyte by VPC [21,22].

When manufacturing BASE by the VPC method, sodium must be supplied to the ZTA precursor in gaseous form. Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder is used as a sodium source known so far, and the VPC process is performed by surrounding ZTA with a sufficient amount of Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder [812]. In this study, a mixture of α-Al2O3, Na2CO3, and Li2CO3, which are the raw material powders for this surrounding powder, was used directly without synthesis process. When Na2CO3 is used as a surrounding powder, molten Na2CO3 sticks to the BASE surface due to its low melting point (850°C). In this study as well, the same problem occurred as shown in Fig. 4. However, this problem could be solved by manufacturing and using the surrounding powder as green pellet, which is a disc-shaped surrounding powder made by pressing a mixture of the raw material powders α-Al2O3, Na2-CO3, and Li2CO3, as shown in Fig. 5. The Na2CO3 contained in the green pellet liquefied at the melting point, and immediately reacted with α-Al2O3 to form Na+-β/β″-Al2O3, preventing contact between the molten Na2CO3 and BASE.

Fig. 4

Na2CO3 stuck to the BASE surface after the VPC reaction.

Fig. 5

Schematic of the VPC using green pellet.

Commercialization of the Na/NiCl2 battery requires manufacturing cost to be reduced through the reuse of surrounding powder and the reduction of the VPC process steps. Therefore, research was conducted to optimize the reusable conditions and allowable range of the surrounding powder in the VPC process, which has not been studied to date, and the properties of the BASE and surrounding powder manufactured by reusing the surrounding powder in the VPC process were analyzed.

2. Experimental

2.1 Preparation of the surrounding powder as a Na source

The surrounding powders used as Na sources in the VPC experiments were of three types. First, the Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder was synthesized through a calcination process. Second, a mixture of raw material powders, here called the green mixture, was obtained by skipping the calcination process. The third type was the green pellets formed by pressing the green mixture.

As raw material powders, α-Al2O3 (99.99%, High Purity Chemicals Co. Ltd., Japan), Na2CO3, and Li2-CO3 for Li2O as a stabilizer were used. For the experiment of reusing the surrounding powder, it contains 13 wt.% Na2O, 0.4 wt.% Li2O and 86.6 Al2O3 which is more than that applied in previous study [23,24].

The starting materials α-Al2O3, Na2CO3, and Li2-CO3 were weighed according to the composition, and then put into a ball mill to be mixed and ground with methyl alcohol, which is a dispersion solvent, for 8 h. After mixing and grinding, the slurry was dried in oven at 90°C for 24 h.

A portion of the dried powder (green mixture) was calcined at 1200°C for 2 h to synthesize it into Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder. Another portion of the green mixture was prepared into two pellets of 3 g each by uniaxial press and placed on the top and bottom of the ZTA during VPC. The different types of surrounding powder and ZTA were put in an alumina crucible, as shown in Fig. 5, and then put into a box furnace to conduct VPC at 1400°C for 3 h. The ZTA, used as a precursor in the VPC process, is in the form of a disk of 25 mm diameter, 500 μm thickness and 1 g weight, and was provided by the Research Institute of Science and Technology (RIST), Pohang.

2.2 VPC with green pellet

To reuse the surrounding powder after the 1st VPC, which is implemented using the green pellet as surrounding powder, the VPC was performed repeatedly with the used green pellet by replacing a new ZTA. The green pellet was reused up to three times.

2.3 VPC for multiple production by layering

For multiple production of the BASE during VPC, the green pellets and precursor ZTAs were alternately stacked, and placed in an alumina crucible, the crucible lid was locked and sealed, and it was maintained at a temperature of 1400°C for 3 h, as shown in Fig. 6. In this experiment, a total of three ZTAs were used at once, and the possibility of multiple production was determined through analyzing the physical properties of the three BASEs manufactured by the VPC.

Fig. 6

Schematic of the VPC by multilayer stacking.

2.4 Properties measurement

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed to determine the crystal formation and the crystal phase fraction of the specimen. The measurements were made on the BASEs with a diameter of 25 mm. The X-ray diffractometer was operated at a scan speed of 3°·min−1, 2θ range of 5°−80° with a power of 40 kV, 30 mA using Cu-K α-radiation. Calculation of the relative fraction of the crystal phases from the line intensities of the well-resolved peaks was conducted using the following equations [25,26]:

(1) %of α=f(α)f(α)+f(β)+f(β)×100
(2) %of β=f(β)f(α)+f(β)+f(β)×100
(3) %of β=f(β)f(α)+f(β)+f(β)×100
(4) f(α)=12{Iα(104)×109+Iα(113)}
(5) f(β)=13{Iβ(102)×103+Iβ(113)×103.5×Iβ(107)+105.5}
(6) f(β)=12{Iβ(1011_)×104+Iβ(2010_)×108}

where, Iα(104) and Iα(113) denote the X-ray intensities of the (104) and (113) planes of the α-alumina phase, respectively; Iβ(102), Iβ(206), and Iβ(107) represent the X-ray intensities of the (102), (206), and (107) planes of the β-alumina phase, respectively; and Iβ″(1011) and Iβ″(2010) indicate the X-ray intensities of the (1011) and (2010) planes of the β″-alumina phase, respectively.

The microstructure analysis of BASEs after the VPC was performed using SEM (JEOL JSM-6308, Rigaku, Japan). In addition, the distribution state of sodium in BASEs was investigated using EDX. After polishing, the BASEs were heat-treated in an electric furnace at 1350°C for 30 min.

To measure the ion conductivity of the BASEs after the VPC, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement was performed using a complex impedance analyzer (Zahner, IM6, USA). Both sides of the sample were polished using SiC papers, and after applying Pt paste (Heraeus, Germany) with a diameter of 6 mm on both sides of the sample, it was dried in oven for 30 min, and heated in electric furnace to 1200°C to attach a Pt electrode. For EIS analysis, the frequency was set in the range of 100 mHz to 3 MHz, and measured in the temperature range 25°C to 350°C. The ion conductivity was calculated using the following formula:

σ=L/(Rm×A)

where, σ is the ion conductivity [S·cm−1], L the membrane thickness [cm], Rm the membrane resistance [Ω], and A the electrode area [cm2].

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the elements constituting the green pellet with a wavelength-dispersive XRF (WD-XRF) was performed to analyze the residual Na content inside the green pellet after the VPC.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Properties of the BASEs according to the type of surrounding powder

Fig. 7 shows the results of analyzing the XRD patterns of the BASEs after the VPC according to the three types of surrounding powder: Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder, green mixture, and green pellet.

Fig. 7

XRD patterns of the BASEs after the VPC according to the type of surrounding powder.

This figure compares the phase analysis results for each surrounding powder. As a result of analyzing the XRD pattern, in all three BASEs, the main peak of α-Al2O3 at 2θ = 35.13° or 43.36° was not observed, and the main peak of the β-Al2O3 was observed very weakly at 2θ = 19.92°, 33.33° or 44.43°, confirming that the ZTAs were mostly synthesized to the Na+-β″-Al2O3.

Fig. 8 shows the microstructure of the BASEs prepared with the two different types of surrounding powder. Irrespective of the type of surrounding powder, it was confirmed that the BASE composites composed of the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 and YSZ were well-formed, and no exaggerated grain growth occurred. Although subtle, the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 grain sizes of BASE prepared using the Na+-β″-Al2O3 surrounding powder were found to be slightly smaller than those prepared using the green mixture.

Fig. 8

SEM images of the BASEs after the VPC according to the type of surrounding powder: (a) Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder, (b) green mixture.

To check the distribution and amount of Na+ ions inside the manufactured BASE that underwent VPC with green pellet, EDX analysis was performed after surface polishing, which is shown in Fig. 9. The red, green, and blue dots represent Na, Al, and O elements, respectively, and the Na+ ions can be seen to be well-distributed. It was confirmed that even if the surrounding powder is used in pressed form during the VPC process, the diffusion of Na+ ions is smooth.

Fig. 9

EDX analysis of the BASE after the VPC with green pellet as the surrounding powder.

To analyze the ionic conductivity of the BASEs prepared by the VPC process according to the three types of surrounding powder, the ionic conductivity was measured at temperatures ranging from 150 to 350°C by EIS, and Fig. 10 compares and analyzes the results.

Fig. 10

Ionic conductivity of the BASE after the VPC according to the type of surrounding powder in the temperature range 150–350°C.

The ionic conductivities of the BASEs produced by the VPC process using green mixtures and green pellets were found to be slightly higher than those using the Na-β″-Al2O3 powder in all temperature ranges. This was attributed to the increased ionic conductivity due to the grain size of the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 of BASE as shown in Fig. 8.

As a result, using a green mixture or green pellet was more effective for the ionic conductivity of the BASE than when using Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder as the surrounding powder. In particular, when green pellets were used, the phenomenon of the surrounding powder sticking to the BASE surface did not appear. Additionally, using green pellets has the advantage of reducing the VPC process costs by omitting the calcination process for producing the Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder.

3.2 Properties of the BASEs manufactured through the reuse of green pellets

Fig. 11 and 12 show the results of the XRD pattern and EIS of the prepared BASEs after the VPC using the reused green pellets, respectively, while Table 2 shows the analysis of the phase fraction and their specific conductivity.

Fig. 11

XRD patterns of the BASE after the VPC according to the reuse of green pellet.

Fig. 12

Specific resistivity of the BASEs at 200°C after the VPC according to the reuse of green pellet.

Phase fraction and specific conductivity of the BASE at 200°C according to the reuse of green pellet

In the 1st VPC, which is implemented using green pellet as the surrounding powder, the BASE showed the highest Na+-β″-Al2O3 phase fraction of 85.3%, but in the 2nd VPC, which is implemented by reusing the surrounding powder used in the 1st VPC, the phase fraction was lowered to 84.3%. In the 3rd VPC, which is implemented by reusing the surrounding powder used in the 2nd VPC, the Na+-β″-Al2O3 phase fraction was further reduced to 84.0%. Even in the 4th VPC, which is implemented by reusing the surrounding powder used in the 3rd VPC, the BASE consisted only of the Na+-β- and β″-Al2O3 crystalline phase, where the Na+-β″-Al2O3 phase fraction was 81.0%. However, when the green pellet was reused beyond that, the α-Al2O3 phase remained in the BASE.

Phase fraction and specific conductivity of the BASE at 200°C according to the type of surrounding powder

The specific conductivity of the BASEs was 2.1×10−2 S·cm−1 at 200°C in the 1st VPC, and decreased to 0.9×10−2 S·cm−1 in the 4th VPC. This shows that the specific conductivity changes in proportion to the composition ratio of the Na+-β″-Al2O3 phase.

During the phase transformation of the ZTA to the BASE, sodium released from the surrounding powder diffuses into the ZTA. In this process, the diffusion rate of sodium increases in proportion to the vapor pressure of the sodium surrounding the ZTA. The higher the diffusion rate, the greater the amount of sodium infiltrated into the ZTA, and thus the greater the Na-β″-Al2O3 phase fraction.

Fig. 13 shows the vapor pressure of the sodium released from the surrounding powder during the VPC process. The sodium vapor pressure of the green pellet was calculated using thermodynamic data (Table 3) and the Knudsen–Langmuir equation, and the sodium vapor pressure of the BASE was calculated with reference to Elrefaie and Smelzer [27].

Fig. 13

Vapor pressure of Na in the surrounding powder (raw material → Na+-β/β″-Al2O3).

Thermodynamic properties of the Na–Al–O system

Thermal decomposition of the Na2CO3 contained in the green pellet begins at 850°C, and continues as the temperature increases, but at a very slow rate. The Na2O formed by thermal decomposition gradually reacts with the α-Al2O3 starting at 900°C, and changes the green pellet into the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 phase, so at 1200°C, all the surrounding powder is converted into the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3.

The Na2O remaining in the green pellet before the surrounding powder is completely converted to beta-alumina, which, having a relatively high sodium vapor pressure (Fig. 12), can promote the VPC reaction more effectively. Therefore, after the 1st VPC, the BASE shows the highest Na+-β″-Al2O3 phase fraction.

To analyze the residual Na2O content inside the green pellet according to the number of times of reuse of the green pellet, the components were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by WD-XRF. The components are composed of Al2O3 and Na2O, and the Na2O content in the starting state before VPC, and after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th VPC, was measured at 13, 10.6, 9.76, 9.05, and 8.17 wt.%, respectively. Table 4 shows the Na2O residual content according to the number of times of reuse of the green pellet. The Na2O content in β-Al2O3 and β″-Al2O3 is calculated to be 5.2 wt.% and 10.8 wt.%, respectively, from the theoretical chemical formula. However, the two phases, β-Al2O3 and β″-Al2O3, are usually formed simultaneously in polycrystalline form, and the fraction of β″-Al2O3 actually shows the highest in the Na2O content range of 8.5–8.9 wt.% [1518]. As shown in Table 4, the Na2O content of the surrounding powder used three times is maintained at 9.05 wt.%. This provided a favorable atmosphere for ZTA to undergo phase transition to β″-Al2O3, and as shown in Table 2, all specimens up to the 4th VPC formed a high beta phase of more than 80%. However, in the case of further reuse, the Na2O content in the surrounding powder became insufficient to create β″-Al2O3, and β-Al2O3 phase rapidly increased and even α-Al2O3 phase appeared. This is evaluated to be able to set a reference point for the change in Na2O content of the green pellets.

Analysis of contents change in the surrounding powder after the VPC according to the reuse of green pellet

3.3 Properties of the BASE after the VPC for multiple production by layering

Fig. 14 and 15 show the results of the XRD pattern and EIS, respectively, of the prepared BASEs after VPC for multiple production by layering. Table 5 shows the analysis of the phase fractions and their specific conductivity.

Fig. 14

XRD patterns of the BASEs after the VPC through multiple production by layering.

Fig. 15

Specific conductivity of the BASEs within the temperature range 150–350°C after the VPC through multiple production by layering.

Phase fraction and specific conductivity of the BASEs at 200°C after the VPC by multiple production by layering

The XRD patterns show that the three BASEs have the same pattern, and that the α-Al2O3 phase in the BASE has been completely converted to Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 phase. The ionic conductivities of the BASEs also show the same value in all measured temperature ranges, regardless of the location of the BASEs stacked in layers within the reactor during the VPC.

Additionally, as shown in Table 5, all three BASEs have very high Na-β″-Al2O3 phase fraction. This is attributed to the free space inside the alumina reactor being reduced by stacking several BASEs in the alumina reactor, thereby increasing the vapor pressure of sodium in the reactor. Accordingly, it seems that as the sodium vapor pressure around the ZTA increased, the ZTA was more actively converted to the Na+-β″-Al2O3 phase.

After multiple production by layering, all three BASEs show the specific conductivity value of 1.7×10−2 S·cm−1. The conductivity of BASE is mainly affected by the phase fraction of the Na+-β″-Al2O3, but other factors, such as the grain size, grain arrangement, and orientation, which are influenced by the VPC reaction environment, also have a significant impact on the conductivity.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we studied ways to reduce the manufacturing cost of thin disk-shaped Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 solid electrolyte (BASE), which is used as a core material in planar Na/NiCl2 secondary batteries, using a vapor phase conversion process (VPC). Our approach focused on the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 powder, a surrounding powder that is generally used in large quantities in the VPC process, but is discarded after just one use.

Two methods were studied through experiments. The first method was to use green pellets mixed with raw material powders, that is α-Al2O3, Na2CO3, and Li2CO3, instead of the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 powder, as the surrounding powder. Through this, the calcination process necessary to synthesize the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3 powder could be omitted. During the VPC process, the problem of the Na2CO3 contained in the surrounding powder melting and sticking to the BASE surface could be solved by forming the surrounding powder into disk-shaped pellets. The ionic conductivity of the BASEs after the VPC with green pellets was no different from that of the conventional VPC using the Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder as the surrounding powder.

The second method was to reuse green pellets that had previously been used in the VPC. Since the number of reuses of green pellets is proportional to the amount of surrounding powder for the precursor ZTA, it was necessary to set a reference for the experimental conditions, so the weight ratio of the two materials was maintained at 3:1. Through the reuse experiment, the green pellet was reused three times, that is, one surrounding powder was used a total of four times; and after three times of reuse, the ionic conductivity of the BASE was maintained close to 10−2 S·cm−1.

To manufacture BASE in large quantities during the actual production process, multiple BASEs must be manufactured in one process. As an experiment for this purpose, the precursor ZTAs and the green pellets were stacked in several layers in a reactor, and the VPC reaction was performed. As a result of the multiple production experiment by layering, all BASEs showed the same properties, which suggests that the multiple production method by layering can produce BASEs with the same properties.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) and the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT), through the International Cooperative R&D program (P0018443).

Notes

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

1. Benato R, Cosciani N, Crugnola G, Sessa S. D, Lodi G, Parmeggiani C, Todeschini M. J. Power Sources 2015;293:127–136.
2. Sudworth J. L. J. Power Sources 2001;100(1–2):149–163.
3. Jung K, Chang H.-J, Bonnett J. F, Canfield N. L, Sprenkle V. L, Li G. J. Power Sources 2018;396:297–303.
4. Lu X, Li G, Kim J. Y, Lemmon J. P, Sprenkle V. L, Yang Z. J. Power Sources 2012;215:288–295.
5. Lu X, Coffey G, Meinhardt K, Sprenkle V, Yang Z, Lemmon J. P. ECS Trans 2010;28(22):7.
6. Hueso K. B, Palomares V, Armand M, Rojo T. Nano Res 2017;10:4082–4114.
7. Li G, Lu X, Kim J. Y, Viswanathan V. V, Meinhardt K. D, Engelhard M. H, Sprenkle V. L. Adv. Energy Mater 2015;5(12):1500357.
8. Parthasarathy P, Virkar A.V. J. Electrochem. Soc 2013;160:A2268.
9. Ghadbeigi L, Szendrei A, Moreno P, Sparks T. D, Virkar A. V. Solid State Ion 2016;290:77–82.
10. Li N, Wen Z, Liu Y, Xu X, Lin J, Gu Z. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc 2009;29(14):3031–3037.
11. Lu X, Evans J. R. G, Heavens S. N. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc 2012;32(16):4219–4228.
12. Ligon S. C, Bay M.-C, Heinz M. V. F, Battaglia C, Graule T, Blugan G. Materials 2020;13(2):433.
13. Jung K. Y, Park Y.-C, Son S, Lee Y, Kim C.-S, Jin D, Shim W, Chang H. J, Li G, Sprenkle V. Meet. Abstr 2017;MA2017-02:81.
14. Beevers C. A, Ross M. A. S. Z. Kristallogr 1937;97(1–6):59–66.
15. Heinz M. V. F, Bay M.-C, Vogt U. F, Battaglia C. Acta Mater 2021;213:116940.
16. Schäfer G. W, Kim H. J, Aldinger F. Solid State Ion 1997;97(1–4):285–289.
17. Feret F. R, Roy D, Boulanger C. Spectrochim. Acta B 2000;55(7):1051–1061.
18. Peters C. R, Bettman M, Moore J. W, Glick M. D. Acta Crystallogr. B 1971;27(9):1826–1834.
19. Yamaguchi G, Suzuki K. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan 1968;41(1):93–99.
20. Sartori S, Martucci A, Muffato A, Guglielmi M. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc 2004;24(6):911–914.
21. Lee D.-H, Han S.-S, Kim Y.-H, Lim S.-K. J. Ind. Eng. Chem 2019;76:366–373.
22. Virkar A. V, Jue J.-F, Fung K.-Z. Alkali-metal-β-and β″-alumina and gallate polycrystalline ceramics and fabrication by a vapor phase method. U.S. Patent No 6,117,807. 2000.
23. Sasidharanpillai A, Kim H, Cho Y, Kim D, Lee S, Jung K, Lee Y. J. Korean Electrochem. Soc 2022;25(4):191–200.
24. Ray A. K, Subbarao E. C. Mater. Res. Bull 1975;10(6):583–590.
25. Lee D.-H, Lee D.-G, Lim S.-K. Ceram. Int 2021;47(17):24743–24751.
26. Schmid C. J. Mater. Sci. Lett 1986;5:263–266.
27. Elrefaie F. A, Smeltzer W. W. Solid State Ion 1984;12:517–524.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

The 5 Wh class planar Na/NiCl2 battery cell (left) and its major components (right) [13].

Fig. 2

Crystal structure of the Na+-β/β″-Al2O3: (a) Na+-β-Al2O3, (b) Na+-β″-Al2O3 [19].

Fig. 3

(a) Schematic illustration and (b) SEM imagery of the cross-sectional surface morphology of the conversion process from α-alumina/YSZ composite to Na+-β/β″-alumina/YSZ composite electrolyte by VPC [21,22].

Fig. 4

Na2CO3 stuck to the BASE surface after the VPC reaction.

Fig. 5

Schematic of the VPC using green pellet.

Fig. 6

Schematic of the VPC by multilayer stacking.

Fig. 7

XRD patterns of the BASEs after the VPC according to the type of surrounding powder.

Fig. 8

SEM images of the BASEs after the VPC according to the type of surrounding powder: (a) Na+-β″-Al2O3 powder, (b) green mixture.

Fig. 9

EDX analysis of the BASE after the VPC with green pellet as the surrounding powder.

Fig. 10

Ionic conductivity of the BASE after the VPC according to the type of surrounding powder in the temperature range 150–350°C.

Fig. 11

XRD patterns of the BASE after the VPC according to the reuse of green pellet.

Fig. 12

Specific resistivity of the BASEs at 200°C after the VPC according to the reuse of green pellet.

Fig. 13

Vapor pressure of Na in the surrounding powder (raw material → Na+-β/β″-Al2O3).

Fig. 14

XRD patterns of the BASEs after the VPC through multiple production by layering.

Fig. 15

Specific conductivity of the BASEs within the temperature range 150–350°C after the VPC through multiple production by layering.

Table 1

Phase fraction and specific conductivity of the BASE at 200°C according to the type of surrounding powder

BASE β″-Al2O3 phase fraction (%) β-Al2O3 phase fraction (%) Ionic conductivity (S·cm−1)
VPC with β″ powder 85.6 14.4 1.4×10−2
VPC with green mixture 85.3 14.7 1.5×10−2
VPC with green pellet 85.2 14.8 1.5×10−2

Table 2

Phase fraction and specific conductivity of the BASE at 200°C according to the reuse of green pellet

BASE β″-Al2O3 phase fraction (%) β-Al2O3 phase fraction (%) Ionic conductivity (S·cm−1)
1st VPC 85.3 14.7 2.1×10−2
2nd VPC 84.3 15.7 1.5×10−2
3rd VPC 84.0 16.0 1.3×10−2
4th VPC 81.0 19.0 0.9×10−2

Table 3

Thermodynamic properties of the Na–Al–O system

Temp. (K) Ref. states* Reactions ΔfGo (J molNa2O−1)**
1073 (800°C) Na2O(s), Na(l), O2 Na2O(s) = 2Na(l) + 1/2O2 270806
Tb(Na) = 883°C
1173 (900°C) Na2O(s), Na(g), O2 Na2O(s) = 2Na(g) + 1/2O2 254072
1273 (1000°C) Na2O(s), Na(g), O2 Na2O(s) = 2Na(g) + 1/2O2 228149
Tm(Na2O) = 1132°C
*

Tm(Na2CO3) = 850°C : Na2CO3 → Na2O + CO2 (Decomposition completed)

**

ΔfGo : from JANAF Table

Knudsen and Langmuir equation: P=mt·A2πRTM

Table 4

Analysis of contents change in the surrounding powder after the VPC according to the reuse of green pellet

Times of reuse of the green pellet Na2O (wt.%) Al2O3 (wt.%)
Before VPC 13.00 87.0
1st VPC 10.60 89.4
2nd VPC 9.76 90.2
3rd VPC 9.05 91.0
4th VPC 8.17 91.8

Table 5

Phase fraction and specific conductivity of the BASEs at 200°C after the VPC by multiple production by layering

BASE β″-Al2O3 phase fraction (%) β-Al2O3 phase fraction (%) Ionic conductivity (S·cm−1)
BASE (1) 98 2 1.7×10−2
BASE (2) 98 2 1.7×10−2
BASE (3) 98 2 1.7×10−2